public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Dave Page <[email protected]>
To: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Katz <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Cramer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 14:41:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+OCxoz2Mc3bmq5Dz2Biy1--ZUoHxXT2PUeuYH919v4KPZqFzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevEz6nN3HUGDTbdmcMLoY+3MdqbQrq7fR+wZsg1LJrRP=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CADK3HH+rXnoyzrqmbb3Mp+WFSaPCwQZ8Zjr5uMHLKXq8t9kCig@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+OCxoxcOUwFmfqw+TA2Ly09ELq12BfuXv8kJ1KzBBausVgBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABUevEz6nN3HUGDTbdmcMLoY+3MdqbQrq7fR+wZsg1LJrRP=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:37, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:29, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the
> funds group
> >> >>> policy document on the website. The first para on the page
> explains Core
> >> >>> Team
> >> >>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
> >> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
> >> >>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
> >> >> +1 from me
> >> >
> >> > -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
> >> > modify it.
> >>
> >> Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which
> should be
> >> changed at some point? Right now it implies that the Funds group
> reports to
> >> the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group,
> which
> >> AFAIK isn't correct.
> >
> >
> > Yes, it is. The core team has the power of veto over the Liaison and
> Deputy Liaison.
> >
> > This page is the charter which describes the relationship between the
> project and the funds group, so it makes sense (because others within SPI
> don't know our project) to have all the key details in one place.
>
> Perhaps it should not actually be listed under "general policies"
> then, and instead have a separate heading for charters? I think it's
> the only such page we have, right?
>
At the moment, I believe it is. We should probably add something similar
for PGCA though.
--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
In-Reply-To: <CA+OCxoz2Mc3bmq5Dz2Biy1--ZUoHxXT2PUeuYH919v4KPZqFzw@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox