MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <516C4833.2050805@dalibo.info>
References: <516C4833.2050805@dalibo.info>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:49:10 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+U5nMKRFBp9vhO_+Y4XJpvd00HDn4P0UDyoNDZ77=Bq8fVypg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On 15 April 2013 19:34, damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info> wrote:

> Last week, I submitted an article on pg.org (id #1459) about the release
> of ora2pg11. The content is pretty much the same as the mail I sent to
> -announce on the same day :
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/516533D0.2090906@dalibo.info
>
> I see the article is not approved. Did I miss something ? Is there any
> reason for this ?

2ndQuadrant has experienced significant delays in at least 3 cases
also. There is definitely a problem somewhere there.

Perhaps we should make all posts wait the same length of time, to
allow reasonable time to decide whether posts are suitable? 72 hours
seems like a reasonable time for this.

That way it would allow (and require) some planning.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www