Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8034C7207 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:11:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44834-05 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379DFC7205 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:11:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQpZe-0003ig-HK for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:11:29 +0000 Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so355025ywt.19 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:11:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=k1xd5CJJlqqaRTxFsHntFYpO//bwQWqv6k6GmgUl8iU=; b=Czoasipd+/9D1UwiLCB9UHXgdYxMxsxcwfbKyKGV0YA+Z39uIu3b4L/wMPGXblvfCk 1MXsQgwQCrqoEQcVE1g2iFOKAfJborOiLh/TxNvN5z+ubLuVmrTkOgWN6sU9i0Fyr0MR HhF8IjJrzpPqviSuG8stetWrJ+5akbHDM2Tvs= Received: by 10.50.100.194 with SMTP id fa2mr32634171igb.49.1321488673265; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:11:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.241.8 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:10:42 -0800 (PST) From: Thom Brown Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:10:42 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: r0DvhFFBdnITU8MUvJtfNzpyELA Message-ID: Subject: PostgreSQL website redesign To: "w^3" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.899 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201111/20 X-Sequence-Number: 20296 Hi all, As you will no doubt be aware, the PostgreSQL website is overdue for a fresh lick of paint, so we are planning to give it a new look in the near future. The plan is to use some existing community funds to employ the services of a professional designer who will be able to produce the new design. Some of the community already have experience working with the designer in question as they designed the Postgres Open website (http://postgresopen.org/), and I think you will agree, they did an excellent job. With that in mind, we want to establish some design goals. These will include : - what is the website's target audience? - how do we wish to be perceived? (e.g. traditional, modern, friendly, professional etc.) - what do we hope to achieve with the website design? - what new opportunities does this present us with? - what usability problems do we currently have that the redesign could address? You may have heard it said "there is no spoon". Similarly, there is no bike shed, so there's no colour to paint it. In other words, the gritty details (such as layout, colour, font-size, borders etc.) aren't up for discussion at this stage. Instead, a design committee (which has already been selected) shall agree on the final design goals, liaise with the designer to discuss the finer details, and to ensure our goals are met. The final design will be licenced under our very own PostgreSQL Licence. So with that, I'd like to open this topic for discussion. Thanks Thom