MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAAKRu_aQUOaMYrcjNuXeSkJtaX9oRUzKP57bsYbC0gVVWS+cbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1373018.1736213217@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAAKRu_bz3BD4w0jmjfQkckAQE5eb-Ge2a=9Q-HG_rWSTeG_PzA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAKRu_bz3BD4w0jmjfQkckAQE5eb-Ge2a=9Q-HG_rWSTeG_PzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:31:01 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAAKRu_Ymux_RBzp5faSR5-qx1JdM6qS3POVjcWyHbnQjzgmo8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection
 Defaults section
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_Ymux_RBzp5faSR5-qx1JdM6qS3POVjcWyHbnQjzgmo8g%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 12:15=E2=80=AFPM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Cool, I've attached a patch to do this. I left a few of the GUCs under
> Resource Consumption (like autovacuum_work_mem and
> vacuum_buffer_usage_limit) where they are because it seemed
> appropriate.
>
> This is my first docs patch that introduces new sections and such, so
> I'm not sure I got the indentation 100% correct (I, of course, tried
> to follow conventions).

Oh, one thing I forgot to say. Though I increased the indentation of
some of the subsections that I moved, I didn't rewrap the lines
because they were already not wrapped to 78. I can do this, but I
can't tell from the existing docs what text width the paragraphs of
text are supposed to be wrapped to.

- Melanie