Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U44MM-0006Vi-FB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:56:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U44ML-0006fO-1E for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:56:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U44MK-0006fJ-5w for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:56:24 +0000 Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U44MI-0008KK-MC for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:56:23 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k20so5114034iak.29 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:56:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=wlHoYuWgqGWIo9qghfiNfqX4YmZqIsJzlfR2dRSj3J8=; b=OBtZPSVVVZe9+e6p3miDjyZL/RLFpmQKh0hDCm1VYuXeQxPEsrykI+MO36UkcOBS8O kQvhAopJkmlxFEHuQQ3QTHrq3ogTC8ilqumPiE0fq851tYrJNXYu4FDQPfu8y6m3oJny vMR73Bd5qkkHF6E3vMV9xuuD8ZACqXFOeun8DrB/kxRgdIE/Pw1Jh0557WVr01F2Y3fZ OzOUuo5W9EBM5mW5HffularaA2uy2Thw2HJKcpjhIewgvRzneN3p1DWIePgvQUwWYSlN qXruzjeJoEr56lu8q7jCYGVL7t+WeCkhqhNoMC9Lf2mUd/HUDU1Alph5mvFKEUESNVlY W+ew== X-Received: by 10.50.236.41 with SMTP id ur9mr7261310igc.7.1360392981067; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:56:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.192.196 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:55:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5112C602.3090109@agliodbs.com> <14838.1360187606@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5112E08C.9040705@commandprompt.com> <511447A4.3070700@agliodbs.com> From: Daniel Farina Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:55:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs To: Magnus Hagander Cc: PostgreSQL-development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkvCtBX6+AQuFzJbvf73fUKTO0b6JRyw8qehEWIBz96GBDeBmSLJ3HMT8cSSC2b5r7Nd/eP X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> This is a few too many steps, and certainly appears completely broken to >> any newcomer. > > I agree it's way too many step. Several of those can certainly be made > more efficient now that we have a more sane archives, well within the > scope of the current system. I have thought it'd be 'nice' if pre-generated binaries and git repos were made for each submitted patch. Is there a nice-and-tidy way to paginate over list traffic from an external program over The Internet? Is there/could there be a nice pagination marker? Is that a reasonable step zero to making other things that consume email? -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers