MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CABUevEwUDjSUy57CN45-02wc3ncmpJwwbta__Y8O5trvWJWDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <dd446d3a-c99f-64c2-9b02-1e2f64edaf23@kaltenbrunner.cc>
 <18940.1551545018@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <18940.1551545018@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:35:36 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEw1j19KE26Hqs__1sJq32RMa=gU4Pkvc9jdo_Vd0zB6yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Namespace projects.postgresql.org
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>,
	PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba9e6005833695f4"
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000ba9e6005833695f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 5:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> > Is this proposal also for cleaning up the old gborg and pgfoundry data
> > on our file-mirrors (ie: http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/projects/) or do
> > we want to keep those?
>
> Are those actually just mirrors, or is it likely that they're now the
> only accessible copies of that stuff?  I'd be kind of inclined to keep
> such data just for archival reasons.  Doesn't mean it has to be easily
> accessible of course, and we should make sure it's presented as historical
> rather than current projects.
>

They are no longer being actively updated, no. For gborg there definitely
doesn't exist anything else. For pgfoundry I don't know exactly how dead it
is. But the last sync was pulled sometime in 2013.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

--000000000000ba9e6005833695f4
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 5:43 PM Tom La=
ne &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>&gt; wrote=
:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.=
8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Stefan Kaltenb=
runner &lt;stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc&gt; writes:<br>
&gt; Is this proposal also for cleaning up the old gborg and pgfoundry data=
<br>
&gt; on our file-mirrors (ie: <a href=3D"http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/proj=
ects/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/p=
rojects/</a>) or do<br>
&gt; we want to keep those?<br>
<br>
Are those actually just mirrors, or is it likely that they&#39;re now the<b=
r>
only accessible copies of that stuff?=C2=A0 I&#39;d be kind of inclined to =
keep<br>
such data just for archival reasons.=C2=A0 Doesn&#39;t mean it has to be ea=
sily<br>
accessible of course, and we should make sure it&#39;s presented as histori=
cal<br>
rather than current projects.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>They are =
no longer being actively updated, no. For gborg there definitely doesn&#39;=
t exist anything else. For pgfoundry I don&#39;t know exactly how dead it i=
s. But the last sync was pulled sometime in 2013.=C2=A0</div></div><div><br=
></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><=
div>=C2=A0Magnus Hagander<br>=C2=A0Me: <a href=3D"http://www.hagander.net/"=
 target=3D"_blank">https://www.hagander.net/</a><br>=C2=A0Work: <a href=3D"=
http://www.redpill-linpro.com/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.redpill-linpr=
o.com/</a></div></div></div></div>

--000000000000ba9e6005833695f4--