MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130219120304.GB20153@momjian.us>
References: <20130214122643.GF30046@msgid.df7cb.de>
	<511D2E58.6010705@agliodbs.com> <511D4E61.5050808@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us>
	<20130216084421.GA1223@msgid.df7cb.de>
	<20130216153309.GF12029@momjian.us>
	<20130216234034.GG12029@momjian.us>
	<20130217054028.GA6000@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20130217121745.GH12029@momjian.us>
	<20130218020824.GA4691@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20130219120304.GB20153@momjian.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:04:04 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEwHJDzT-QQJ0vn7_EVGCtMg7yd-ccD2U+eyJj5zNUL3Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: We should not transition to
	apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>,
	Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org>,
	PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL in Debian <pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:08:25PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:40:28AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 09:44:22AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> > > > > > Re: Bruce Momjian 2013-02-16 <20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us>
>> > > > > > > I don't think "codename" is really good wording here:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > That's the official Debian/Ubuntu term, though we can certainly use
>> > > > > > something else if it makes things easier for users.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > OK.  How do people find their codename?
>> > > >
>> > > > OK, I found the answer:
>> > > >
>> > > >         $ lsb_release --short --codename
>> > > >         squeeze
>> > >
>> > > Uhm.
>> > >
>> > > $ lsb_release
>> > > No LSB modules are available.
>> >
>> > Uh, that's what I get too.  Try it with the arguments I suggested,
>> > please.
>>
>> Oh, what a weird program.  Yes, I get "wheezy" with your suggested
>> options.
>
> Adding to this complexity, I just realized that the Ubuntu code names
> are different from the Debian code names, even though Ubuntu is based on
> Debian.  Fortunately "lsb_release --short --codename" works on both.
> While most Debian users probably know their code name, I doubt Ubuntu
> users do.
>
> Do we actually create different packages for Debian and Ubuntu?

Yes, but that's just because the dependencies are different versions.
There is no functionality difference in our debian and ubuntu
packages.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www