Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BD5EC32B9 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIOol-00024f-Cy for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:32:28 +0000 Received: by lahj13 with SMTP id j13so1799356lah.19 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=2LB2iA+XwNDH84NNqHmirmlaJhGBLXZKnO4jURw3ShU=; b=mG3NnDyBIbig6esxVEp2RNV+SXrLvyL/Ll2HPKCrVKZKLvEGeZ/6zwrkMLQl964Zq/ x1qPJNdLaPqRQVaMS9HGZC0xzhREhLBSnfmcv+OfqsOMrpd1yxU6VOlIHSpNJSGivVdu PNp2XxIvd243vliHJb3YtSIMrfRCprXGy0Z7LQ8msi5zk5MUZ8fEk9EHg1Wf0t9oaoux WXSjn6jhb4FDDKEmrN/l2aZsGANgnJkIShtTKrv3VJDHOjjWeBSIxEexRsEzsgpfSWWO HcnwQiLJDNcS7Da065dtP5uYmcsWUOvhFYccbA8h4YHGVOefj8Wu990Qu7I8q+/fiEjs IRqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.99.198 with SMTP id es6mr1478272lbb.66.1334255533481; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.13.104 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:32:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent spam on general From: Magnus Hagander To: Greg Sabino Mullane Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCX5FsTj4rjF3eSAOKoJBSA3co49QRjpIaG47FsvZ7FGA2e6wsbzbqkaVHwwpgOi/PMRhF X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Archive-Number: 201204/19 X-Sequence-Number: 20593 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 18:19, Greg Sabino Mullane wrot= e: > > > I just ubsubscribed sj_savio@yahoo.com, which posted a spam to > pgsql-general that made it through my filters and, as > Tom pointed out, had a non-blank subject line. Interestingly, > the spam score was MINUS 3.6, so we have some tweaking > to do :) Highlights: You're looking at the wrong header. Our spam score gave it 2.1. Which is still not very much, but a lot better than minus 3.6.. //Magnus >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: no more strict deadlines!! >> Date: 4:15 AM on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 >> X-Maillaunder-Av-Scan: YES:33e35bd1c297b6e2f973326ac0219a03 >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on incoming.mail= launder.com >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D-3.6 required=3D5.0 tests=3DBAYES_00,DKIM_SIG= NED, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RDNS_NONE autolearn=3Dham version=3D3.2= .5 >> X-Spam-PDF-Info: pdf=3D_PDFCOUNT_, pdfimg=3D_PDFIMGCOUNT_, ver=3D_PDFVER= SION_, name=3D_PDFNAME_ >> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 >> X-Yahoo-Newman-ID: 375087.14130.bm@omp1041.mail.bf1.yahoo.com >> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 >> X-PG-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) >> X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general > > - -- > Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com > PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204121218 > http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=3D2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iEYEAREDAAYFAk+HAIEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg0ugCeIFt1FsKMim6PJdGK7peHwVq2 > Yv0AoNUi95zh3BG9ejbaRHPfeqtkvWpo > =3D5TUn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www --=20 =A0Magnus Hagander =A0Me: http://www.hagander.net/ =A0Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/