MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200917184923.GA25665@alvherre.pgsql>
 <237180.1600369426@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <237180.1600369426@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:17:07 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEwoRe0y_TxJWYF4D8O-jWxxwfebFXQOYtCZ5RHzNzviZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>,
 Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>,
	Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2dc5f05af873b96"
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000a2dc5f05af873b96
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:03 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > BTW now that this is working, I think we should discuss that if person A
> > cross-posts, and that post is approved, then whenever person B replies
> > it should also be approved -- surely there's no need to approve the
> > cross-posting (for the known subset of lists) for each reply.
>
> If that can be automated it'd surely make things noticeably less painful.
> As is, once somebody's started a multi-list thread, the only way to get
> out of trouble is for someone to remember to remove other lists from a
> reply ... and even then, if anyone replies to an earlier post, it's a mess
> all over again.  But I didn't realize we had the ability to pre-approve
> whole threads for this filter?
>

We don't. And I don't see an obvious way to do it either.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

--000000000000a2dc5f05af873b96
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:03 PM Tom Lane =
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>&gt; wrote:<b=
r></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding=
-left:1ex">Alvaro Herrera &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com" t=
arget=3D"_blank">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>&gt; writes:<br>
&gt; BTW now that this is working, I think we should discuss that if person=
 A<br>
&gt; cross-posts, and that post is approved, then whenever person B replies=
<br>
&gt; it should also be approved -- surely there&#39;s no need to approve th=
e<br>
&gt; cross-posting (for the known subset of lists) for each reply.<br>
<br>
If that can be automated it&#39;d surely make things noticeably less painfu=
l.<br>
As is, once somebody&#39;s started a multi-list thread, the only way to get=
<br>
out of trouble is for someone to remember to remove other lists from a<br>
reply ... and even then, if anyone replies to an earlier post, it&#39;s a m=
ess<br>
all over again.=C2=A0 But I didn&#39;t realize we had the ability to pre-ap=
prove<br>
whole threads for this filter?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We don&#=
39;t. And I don&#39;t see an obvious way to do it either.</div><div>=C2=A0<=
/div></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"lt=
r"><div>=C2=A0Magnus Hagander<br>=C2=A0Me: <a href=3D"http://www.hagander.n=
et/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.hagander.net/</a><br>=C2=A0Work: <a href=
=3D"http://www.redpill-linpro.com/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.redpill-l=
inpro.com/</a></div></div></div></div>

--000000000000a2dc5f05af873b96--