MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3418b270dc001a1da7e1ec9373b77037@biglumber.com>
References: <50C653B5.1070603@agliodbs.com>
	<3418b270dc001a1da7e1ec9373b77037@biglumber.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:35:37 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevExQksf8r1ohH43CQzk58BZFkSFFkg-tNwakyDHpMZec_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgfoundry.org down
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Seems it is up now, http://pgfoundry.org
>>>
>>> ... and down again.
>
>> Confirmed down, all day today.
>
> Remember that (for some very strange reason), Marc is
> not on the -www list, so we are really talking among
> ourselves. Can a list admin just put him on the list please?

I think subscribing somebody to a list who doesn't want to be on the
list is a really bad idea.

Plus, he would probably just unsubscribe from it again because, well,
you know, he doesn't want to be on it.

Better that those who report it down send emails to him directly. In
theory, I think the place to send it is gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org,
but that obviously doesn't work when pgfoundry is down...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www