Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E92AD7E31 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:44:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgHe1-00068j-IM for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:44:06 +0000 Received: by lbbgm6 with SMTP id gm6so3800164lbb.19 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:43:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=zHiRXbKHPW8rtVOWB/9FrHxCgArPlWyA2lfQIOLg3Y8=; b=FCb66XIGy/zKXpdPcSKRjWEvcMQrddDlhJ3BhEGBoLUQAvDyhsY0IAANCSdLAHkgrq Whos7jXsHWFg+msmKZq9+3pRnuF8/jjvFTvXuKbXLj7ZUYyKcHbT0MKZoGSw21vI7ZIy 5lmiNrMKmpfSsc+DSixICgS31EzIHGItB0Ah9y+9uG7hnSJA6i4k10stXtILsZaKT4mw df9PDseaZy+x9xFwdZfpnifne6rT7mFpk3Wie5+pQ67RT2D7/Wvc8BlJ0Wz+oPmy29Gc peoymM7jw0wRSJO4Uq9YbOoim3xUr6lqaEZiAL0f/byv63/wLJA/UMdSe+Tb8tMI55sQ 22rA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.125.116 with SMTP id mp20mr11465621lab.19.1339947832183; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.21.234 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:43:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:43:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section From: Magnus Hagander To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL WWW , Palle Girgensohn , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pierre=2DEmmanuel_Andr=E9?= , bjorn.munch@oracle.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlFgc3O+RgGqnEMmFz6TRzjx6sy0qegrVealqm8ufYPBBLYNP9yt/uYKwHwfQ4MNkIg6Z2V X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201206/33 X-Sequence-Number: 20727 On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dave Page wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wr= ote: >> >>> The large bold warnings about the installers were added because they >>> used to be listed at the top of the page, above the platform-specific >>> packaging options (because they tended to confuse people less). It's >>> yet to be seen if users will become confused again - we have the info >>> they should need now, but I suspect that doesn't necessarily mean >>> they'll read it before emailing us. In any case, I think those >>> warnings should either be removed or made non-bold now. >> >> I wouldn't want to remove them at all, since they're clearly still corre= ct. >> >> In fact, given the number of people I've run into who've had problems >> because of that, I'd rather leave them as bold as well. > > Citations please? I don't recall ever hearing of people running into > such problems. I still maintain that it should be pretty blindingly As I've said previously, it's mainly been from people who aren't on our lists, so I can't easily point there. I know it's up on the lists every now and then as well, but it's getting too late in the evening to spend time searching for that. I've heard it from customers. I've heard it from people I've met at conferences. I've heard it in IRC channels. I've heard it in usergroups. --=20 =A0Magnus Hagander =A0Me: http://www.hagander.net/ =A0Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/