Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5882FC83CAD for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:37:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoV0l-0001RZ-4A for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:37:31 +0000 Received: by lbbgm6 with SMTP id gm6so21698657lbb.19 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:37:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=pYmLXYnexVun1UpBnvqfQYE5716xpUCLFHgaY/vawxs=; b=NOGcJvH16HBsZGMyc8CWeQG6z7L0fyEiv1vGQaPX/n8Cq/THJNyHycTT9b0AtqfGAW EYsOghC5WPojRA4DWqGDWEAIWeVCHxg1tr7EZy9Lp+723oJoljBXdung7XgNW5wcA6Qn ibiSrgfm+BFWAi15JzIPswA/mBMUOBMF3Rqwy8jifVr9pG0/RR6HSvHQS6R3HhFxig0b CdIzPf0/RCWmxmRm7fp6vLOWQ9GCbRUMClKbsZse6TDzFQpnxXTvZa4p7dFO3UG/f1C9 xG5WX1VX+hqyNdcmN4wkfdyhawCLtqXluq3h5GrZL8CbLw1FP3DfIdbTCddmtTmbXguB 0W/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.148.170 with SMTP id tt10mr43721497lab.48.1341905837177; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.21.234 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:37:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FFB6A75.6090507@agliodbs.com> References: <28687.1341523141@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29222.1341524488@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org> <2405.1341528250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4FF72D24.1010206@kaltenbrunner.cc> <4FFB67BD.90908@agliodbs.com> <4FFB6A75.6090507@agliodbs.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:37:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues From: Magnus Hagander To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkayMsQjpjkqlX6tGXcS7Vb0UCX0CjVl2VgsdNNfA2DvxPyBaaiiS2AvF2ujo0fu5BmFltQ X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201207/69 X-Sequence-Number: 20818 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 7/9/12 4:22 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> >>>> I think we should completely drop all references to the google docs >>>> thingy and the -testers list there and redirect people simply to -bugs >>>> and/or hackers. >> >> Oh, dammit. I thought I took the google thing out when we went beta, >> but apparently I didn't save my changes. >> >> People do use -testers. While -bugs/-hackers is superior for >> experienced testers, submitting stuff to those lists can be a bit >> intimidating. But how does that actually help if nobody who could fix things read it? > See new text on wiki. The "what goes in the field" part seems to still talk about a google doc that now doesn't exist - like "mark multiple options if...". -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/