MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87970758-9EF7-401A-8B91-D4A99ADA9EC1@yesql.se>
 <CADK3HH+rXnoyzrqmbb3Mp+WFSaPCwQZ8Zjr5uMHLKXq8t9kCig@mail.gmail.com>
 <7031a8d39e8a5f2545c9c7ad2c17d763@postgresql.org>
 <B10F3C64-C50A-4BE7-91E6-55401BFE36F1@yesql.se>
 <CA+OCxoxcOUwFmfqw+TA2Ly09ELq12BfuXv8kJ1KzBBausVgBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+OCxoxcOUwFmfqw+TA2Ly09ELq12BfuXv8kJ1KzBBausVgBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:37:36 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEz6nN3HUGDTbdmcMLoY+3MdqbQrq7fR+wZsg1LJrRP=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Jonathan Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>,
	Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEz6nN3HUGDTbdmcMLoY%2B3MdqbQrq7fR%2BwZsg1LJrRP%3DuQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:35=E2=80=AFPM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:29, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>
>> > On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrot=
e:
>> >>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the funds=
 group
>> >>> policy document on the website.  The first para on the page explains=
 Core
>> >>> Team
>> >>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
>> >>>        https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
>> >>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
>> >> +1 from me
>> >
>> > -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
>> > modify it.
>>
>> Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which shou=
ld be
>> changed at some point?  Right now it implies that the Funds group report=
s to
>> the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group, w=
hich
>> AFAIK isn't correct.
>
>
> Yes, it is. The core team has the power of veto over the Liaison and Depu=
ty Liaison.
>
> This page is the charter which describes the relationship between the pro=
ject and the funds group, so it makes sense (because others within SPI don'=
t know our project) to have all the key details in one place.

Perhaps it should not actually be listed under "general policies"
then, and instead have a separate heading for charters? I think it's
the only such page we have, right?

//Magnus