MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130412182249.GA28228@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CABUevEzJJymOU2WvFKRpK21R+qbDiun5+y47=L11UCjSHcOLdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<35e025e63cad041bcebfcc33ec0a2c44@biglumber.com>
	<20130411233957.GA3394@momjian.us>
	<CA+U5nMKHc2sc4C8GPQ3Sg_q5PSZQvbbLeRx+mNUXsJ-4PP-5gw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130412015633.GD3394@momjian.us> <1235.1365732018@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20130412021145.GE3394@momjian.us>
	<20130412021330.GF3394@momjian.us>
	<CABUevEw_3ZdHkn5ZXvvF4Th3aWVdvuwg_DmLP_Lysbc+NroX2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130412182249.GA28228@momjian.us>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:27:18 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABUevEzUrz61Px4c3jNbxpiFnzZA-Mwyg3xq5C90xVA=MT85NA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updating Sourceforge
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>,
	pgsql-www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:52:08PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:11:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >> What _is_ interesting is that the Sourceforce editors created their own
>> >> PostgreSQL project page:
>> >>
>> >>       https://sourceforge.net/projects/postgresql.mirror/
>> >>
>> >> that is being updated --- I see 9.2.4 updated on 2013-04-04, which was
>> >> our release date, and I even see download stats from that date forward.
>> >>
>> >> What I did just now was to mark 'pgsql' as moved to 'postgresql.mirror';
>> >> unfortunately the text is not clickable.  FYI, I only knew about 'pgsql'
>> >> because I received email from them because I am an admin.
>> >
>> > I have now made the text clickable to redirect to the sf-editor-updated
>> > version.  :-)
>>
>> If there is another one. That's automatically updated. Why not just
>> *drop* this one?
>
> I can mark it as an "Abandoned" project --- done.  Is that better?
>
>         https://sourceforge.net/p/pgsql/admin/overview
>
> That is my only other option (active, moved, abandoned).  I don't think
> so, but take a look.

No, that seems really bad. It now says "As of 2013-04-12, this project
is no longer under active development."

I also notice we've had 49 downloads this week.  Which is pretty bad
since it's all of outdated versions.

Perhaps you should change it back to the link, but also try to find
out if there is a way to *delete* the current downloads that are
horribly out of date. Since people are clearly using them.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www