public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
To: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Chapman Flack <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: missing ML messages
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:34:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CABUevEzYdfJ1pvreTM77xspNpnf5qko-_aMoLh+kC7Wdz6Gz6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CABUevEyYop_zjaCggv-FNd9HCRyb4D2xmj5+Wf16Xqp_PHFU=g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 8:35 PM Justin Pryzby <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 02:37:33PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 4:14 AM Justin Pryzby <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:07:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Justin Pryzby <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > > I noticed that one of my messages never made it to the HTTP page:
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > I see it in the archives, and in my local mail folder too.
> > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
> > >
> > > Ok...I must have entered it wrong somehow.
> > >
> > > So the problem is that it doesn't show up here:
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20170907194236.4cefce96%40wp.localdomain
> > >
> > > Is it because I used two IDs in reply-to headers?
> > >
> > > In-Reply-To: <CAFiTN-updTo3aB+7vsECHOHpjB23Av5OfgZQrt90Q33gFK-oZQ@mail.gmail.com>
> > > <CAFiTN-utJPbTLQ9i10wT_zmHX=un+RQMB1B1xbkTgrh971vqjw@mail.gmail.com>
> > >
> > > In mutt, I would've 't'agged two messages, and then ';'-'r' to reply and quote both.
> >
> > Yeah, I think that's it. We only parse a single value in the in-reply-to.
>
> I wondered if you've tried to address this ?
I have not personally had time to look into it, no (I assume you meant
this for me, even though you addressed it primarily to Champan, who
previously did not participate in the thread). And apparently neither
has anybody else.
> + Chapman Flack, who wrote:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
> > *seeing that RFC 5322 3.6.4 permits more than one msg-id for in-reply-to,
> > crosses fingers to see what PGLister will make of it*
It should be noted that pglister does exactly nothing with it and
should pass it through without making any changes whatsoever.
The question is what happens when it hits the archives, which are not
part of pglister. Which of course still needs to be handled.
A first step would probably be to figure out *what* to do. The RFC
basically appears to punt on the whole idea of what to do with
multiple parents. I'm unsure what would be the best thing for pglister
to do. Just pick the first entry and go with that? That would
certainly be the easiest, but would it be correct?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: missing ML messages
In-Reply-To: <CABUevEzYdfJ1pvreTM77xspNpnf5qko-_aMoLh+kC7Wdz6Gz6g@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox