Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36CC1E34FD8 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:43:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTLXA-0002ZB-08 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:43:16 +0000 Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so1006085vbb.19 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:43:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.38.65 with SMTP id e1mr27195835vdk.131.1322088183245; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.172.199 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:43:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [8.8.38.17] In-Reply-To: References: <4EC7BD63.4080707@dalibo.info> <4EC9058A.9000509@dalibo.info> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:43:03 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ouv57-Q8hs6jHclXEqkv_52QbKg Message-ID: Subject: Re: PostgreSQL website redesign From: Robert Treat To: Dave Page Cc: damien clochard , Thom Brown , "w^3" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archive-Number: 201111/46 X-Sequence-Number: 20322 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Dave Page wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:50 PM, damien clochard wrote: > The reason the contest eventually failed was actually because none of > the designs were actually liked by those judging them. > You know, one might argue that this is not proof that you need a different designer, so much as different judges ;-) Robert Treat play: xzilla.net work: omniti.com