Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F651C315B1 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:07:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKVXv-0004Nu-D1 for pgsql-announce@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:07:51 +0000 Received: by gghe5 with SMTP id e5so3663209ggh.19 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:07:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Jr6x6GSxrsrNObH2Caa4N6ladB1xTROlQ7SB/HF58xk=; b=EQP78l0Ex5LuuxgaTbrBgj6FVWyHaRDKS/LMLWkgkZgLGyohAqZDspsgY6nIhp1pPc O8DL6ZgOjCQYY1NH4GMNinvo9hR5zbipsuh8bhA3mTGs1bswy8vrPSxm5GgU4mYHNxZn XhrUgTKBkpiopX04UFW3I3xDf8CFXPUkPDgvVOXpXjusG8TeA70UZ4TvZLxnadUVyfyx ybyb98OsrnGxW0JHc21+pJYLyHc92CK/aWlX20J5huS4oFhRt4CTtFi1CQoiNswCkQCe FHkqSQ2DLuaVOz0PhlHdoeIIL2lO/J/49oBIrtCS72DuYScQYuQjjELeeNjuoMtggbOd SP3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.79.8 with SMTP id h8mr2367855yhe.79.1334758054732; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.111.11 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:07:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120417145644.GB3667@gmail.com> <20120417150059.GA3753@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:07:34 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PgBouncer 1.5.1 From: Marko Kreen To: Mark Felder Cc: Postgres Announce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201204/15 X-Sequence-Number: 2218 [Re-reply to keep -announce in the loop..] On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > I just realized that PgBouncer 1.5 and 1.5.1 have identical checksums, which > I noticed after I already reported to the maintainer the issue with the > extracted folder being named pgbouncer-1.5 instead of having the proper > version. > > I guess the real issue is that pgbouncer 1.5.1 is vaporware right now :-) The .tar.gz on pgfoundry.org looks OK, so this must be some local problem. -- marko