public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:51:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRBBDAd_jP2AwbyWH5XYMEzyxigDmfohqPEaX1y0PFCvsg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CABUevEyEyYZ58717QeVutJ0bgiN1fKDb0EEObVNax0+cZQRdJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

2013/2/7 Andres Freund <[email protected]>:
> On 2013-02-06 13:25:31 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Mind you, when I explained our current CF review workflow for the SF
>> ReviewFest last year, the attendees thought I was insane. It's kept me
>> from doing more reviewfests. Our current workflow and tooling is
>> definitely a serious obstacle to gettng more reviewers.  Seems like a
>> good topic for the developer meeting.
>
> I personally feel that the CF process isn't limited by technicalities
> like the commitfest UI or by the lack of random reviewers. Its limited
> by the amount of available reviewer time of people with in-depth
> knowledge of pg and committer bandwith.
> Trying to solve that problem via technical means doesn't seem likely to
> work out very well.

+1

Pavel

>
>> >> The existing Gerrit community would be keen to have the PostgreSQL
>> >> project as a major user, though, and would theoretically help with
>> >> modification needs.  Current major users are OpenStack, Mediawiki,
>> >> LibreOffice and QT.
>
> There's also android as a rather major user...
>
>> > I just took a quick look at their system, and when they start talking
>> > about requirements in the 100's of Gb of RAM, 24 core machines and
>> > SSD, I get scared :) But that's to "scale" it - doesn't mention when
>> > you need to do anything like that. I'm assuming we'd be tiny.
>
> Well, with gerrit you do far more work inside the application in
> comparison to what we are doing today in the CF app, so part of this
> probably is just that more work is running through it...
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
>  Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

view thread (35+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
  In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRBBDAd_jP2AwbyWH5XYMEzyxigDmfohqPEaX1y0PFCvsg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox