MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130111044717.GA4624@momjian.us>
References: <50EEA591.3030905@dalibo.info>
	<CAJKUy5jmrAZce3YRDY5HU3JHX=BEveTCt=rN6Ah2nvbLbXb-eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130110235007.GA30000@momjian.us> <50EF76E9.4090502@agliodbs.com>
	<20130111044717.GA4624@momjian.us>
From: Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:58:26 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAJKUy5goBB_WMkYVV-ak+g87=JLW9dKHgLfAQFxnNsTAqVpFbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Training approval policy on pg.org
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:20:25PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> >> That seems to low, specially for a Platinum Sponsor.
>> >> What about 5 per month that will make 15 per quarter just not all of
>> >> them at once.
>> >
>> > Platinum Sponsor?  What is that?
>> >
>>
>> To date, we haven't tied approval polices to sponsor levels.  I wouldn't
>> be opposed to doing so, but it's not our current policy.
>
> Wow, we actually give metal designations for community sponsors:
>
[...]
>
> I also agree that tying things to sponsorship might
> cause problems.
>

mmm... we have done it before...
and no, i don't think that showing some kind of preference for those
showing commitment with the project is bad.

anyway, my suggestion (5 per month, 15 per quarter) wasn't tied to
sponsorship... only my comment, about how low that value is, was

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitaci=F3n
Phone: +593 4 5107566         Cell: +593 987171157


--=20
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www