Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EAD9FA5B6; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:22:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34391-03-2; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:22:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2A49F9247; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:21:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE32FB47249; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:21:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24022-03; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:20:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3FB47220; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:19:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE834E12A; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:20:01 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:19:27 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Magnus Hagander , Dave Page cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <47299CBE.8030403@hagander.net> References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> <47299585.7030402@hagander.net> <47299957.5020605@postgresql.org> <47299CBE.8030403@hagander.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/15 X-Sequence-Number: 12793 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:30:38 +0100 Magnus Hagander wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >>>>> I haven't noticed, but haven't been watchign for it ... can you send me >>>>> full headers of one such affected? This one here seemed to be 'within >>>>> minutes' :( >>>> Here's headers from a message I sent to -core today, which had about an >>>> hour turnaround ... >>> That one is clearly sitting waiting to go through the hub.org antispam >>> for about an hour (between 18:33 ADT and 19:35 ADT). >>> >>> Oh, and the message you sent with this info just took about over 4 hours >>> to get here, which happens fairly often. Headers from this one: >> >> It sat in the mod queue until I approved it earlier. > > Ah, that may explain some of the delays I've been seeing. But only those > between those two hops (postgresql -> hub) I guess. Probably alot of the problems you've been seeing have to do with moderator approval times for some posts ... Tom doesn't usually let me go very long with big delays before letting me know there "might be a problem" ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHKbY/4QvfyHIvDvMRAqehAKDSwRGjk9+f3M9j/ln5OyOy2RV61wCgp/XA PqDh7vJH3jzNjmMuVwWSZbA= =K9py -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----