Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAFB9FBEAE for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:06:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25879-02-6 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:06:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76719FBCFF for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:06:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCC1B46CCF for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:06:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25373-02; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:06:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE5AB46CE1; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:05:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF584E184; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:05:13 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:04:45 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/3 X-Sequence-Number: 12781 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I haven't noticed, but haven't been watchign for it ... can you send me full headers of one such affected? This one here seemed to be 'within minutes' :( - --On Wednesday, October 31, 2007 23:26:35 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > I've seen enormously erratic performance from the mailing lists all day > today --- delivery time for individual messages is up to several hours, > but completely inconsistent. Is it just me, or are other people seeing > the same? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHKVBd4QvfyHIvDvMRAkZEAJ9Y0A56g4rbkRKSfFSe51foW2Ff9gCcDc8n TPM1xzjxPNorQjXo/2CUlro= =ayj9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----