Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649CE9FB2FF for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41937-09 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4779FB2F9 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5158C118DDAB for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07960-09; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-79-174.eastlink.ca [24.137.79.174]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852F1118DDA2; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293A95CEE6; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:45:44 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:45:44 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql-announce not being delivered? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200702051424.48423.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200702051424.48423.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/77 X-Sequence-Number: 11482 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've been working on this this evening, and am talking to Michael (majordmo developer) about it ... I *think* I've narrowed down the problem, and implemented improvements for it, but am waiting to hear back from Michael as to whether there are some sort of 'stats' that record # of recipients actually sent to ... But, I am in the process of diagnosing it ... Just curious, but "haven't gotten anything since December", and you are just mentioning it now ... ? Can you resend the announce you sent this morning ... ? I hate to have it sent out twice, but its important enough, and I believe that I've corrected the major problem causing the failed delivery, and would rather not have to wait until the next announce goes out ... - --On Monday, February 05, 2007 14:24:48 -0800 Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > I just took a brief survey on IRC and found that 70% of the people there > didn't get the release announcement. I didn't get it, nor PWN either. > For that matter, I haven't gotten anything on -announce since December. > > It could be spam filtering issues, but if so they're quite widespread; it > seems that most of our community is not getting most of the -announce > posts. Any idea how to diagnose this? > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL @ Sun > San Francisco - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFx+vY4QvfyHIvDvMRAmrGAJwJCZCwzQ8PWo3q+xE7n1RVQx8BggCfUkIj n9AYuoPWlaQmHQQuhI0kg18= =cgo1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----