Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701FE9FB33B; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:24:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54916-03; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:24:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121629FB30D; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:24:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.10.28.116] (ip2.fa1-0-2.occ.iinet.com [198.145.33.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noel.decibel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B7556483; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:24:23 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20070725054838.71190DCC143@svr2.hagander.net> <46A700A3.40903@postgresql.org> <20070725081046.GA5612@svr2.hagander.net> <689CC6B9-F8AC-426C-B595-7DA7AB2D3E8C@decibel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Magnus Hagander , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Nasby Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:24:11 -0700 To: Marc G. Fournier X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/57 X-Sequence-Number: 12204 On Jul 25, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > - --On Wednesday, July 25, 2007 18:12:50 -0700 Jim Nasby > > wrote: > >> My intention was indeed that general community members could make >> use of >> this. I want to make it easier for other people to advocate >> PostgreSQL, and >> part of that is providing a place where they can upload >> presentations, >> photos, etc. This is something that should be collaborative in >> nature, so I >> don't think techdocs is a good place for it. > > I'd like to move the developer wiki to it own VPS, and out of the core > developer one, just to save against potential 'web based security > holes' ... > would it be an idea ot setup a seperate 'advocacy wiki', along the > lines of > what you are suggesting (with suitable moderation / review) from > the developer > one, which would remian closed? Perhaps we should stop drawing the line at "developer" and "advocacy" and just have one wiki that's open to public edits and one that's not. > And, do you have the time / energy to actually moderate such a > beast ... I > think one of the bigger fears is ppl uploading mis-information into > such an > "official wiki", and I think that fear is fairly justified with the > amount of > spam-bots going around filling in forms left-right-and-center ... If it's dependent on a single person to keep it clean, we're doing something wrong. :) But yes, I'll certainly help in that regard. > Personally, I can see the benefit of what you are suggesting, but > do think that > a certain amount of control / moderation is required to keep it > clean and > accurate ... then again, maybe we want Al Dev back again? For > those that don't > know the name, he into 'creative technical writing' that is akin to > 'the aliens > are coming' :) Sure, we'll have to keep an eye on it. It might also be a good idea to make it clear that it's unofficial. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)