X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670399DD5ED; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:14:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47688-03; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:14:33 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FCC9DD555; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:14:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1ExJx3-000H4t-3L; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:06:25 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Domain conference.postgresql.org requested Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:14:30 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Domain conference.postgresql.org requested Thread-Index: AcYX2P1mYrGVMnlkRnmyLxeUS+WscwAQFV2A From: "Dave Page" To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Josh Berkus" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.349 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.349] X-Spam-Score: 0.349 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/74 X-Sequence-Number: 9262 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > Sent: 13 January 2006 00:33 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Josh Berkus; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Domain conference.postgresql.org requested >=20 >=20 > BTW, I thought that we were going to avoid segmenting the=20 > sites anymore=20 > ... ? Based on discussions in the past, the goal was to=20 > merge, not split=20 > off splinter sites ... ? Yes, it was. Regards, Dave