X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E99DCC40;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:59:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 06931-08; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:59:07 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.91])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38EB9DCD0C;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:59:01 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34]
	helo=vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1FE5NZ-0006vQ-9k; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:59:05 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:59:04 -0000
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E4B1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
thread-index: AcY8bonve4NitfLHTce62Uei9Y0DvgAACV+A
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"Bruce Raup" <brauplists@gmail.com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>,
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.309 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.309]
X-Spam-Score: 0.309
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200602/113
X-Sequence-Number: 9579

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> Sent: 28 February 2006 13:54
> To: Bruce Raup
> Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
>=20
>=20
> This is the second report I've seen of recent purchases going
> unfulfilled and customers being unable to get in contact with anyone
> from the company. I'm inclined to remove the link from the home page
> unless we get someone from the company to address these issues.=20

Yes - we definitely don't want to be linking to a company claiming to
support us that don't deliver the goods they take money for. It's not
fair to the people that don't get their shirts etc, nor does it paint us
in a good light.

Regards, Dave