X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1779DCB7E for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:13:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35998-06 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:13:12 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426329DCB34 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:13:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1FKBxF-0002Io-27 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:13:09 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Web code license Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:13:10 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Web code license thread-index: AcZJqT5bdjusHjWyT+evEj3UA8h8AgAAGI3gAAAR+hAAAFi4wA== From: "Dave Page" To: "Magnus Hagander" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.295 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.295] X-Spam-Score: 0.295 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/104 X-Sequence-Number: 9694 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha@sollentuna.net]=20 > Sent: 17 March 2006 10:03 > To: Dave Page; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Web code license >=20 > > > So... > > >=20 > > > I'm looking at putting in the code for the "new techdocs" in cvs=20 > > > sometime soon, and realised I forgot this question :) > > >=20 > > > The code uses tinymce (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/) for visual=20 > > > editing. > >=20 > > There's a coincidence - guess what I've been hacking about=20 > > all morning! >=20 > :-) >=20 >=20 > > > This is LGPL code. My question is, should this be added to=20 > > cvs (with=20 > > > appropriate license files etc, of course), or should it be kept=20 > > > outside (like the PEAR components we rely on for example). > >=20 > > It should be kept outside I think - perhaps under /files so=20 > > it's nicely seperated. >=20 > /files/ is in cvs.=20 > /files/ is what I had in mind when I said "in cvs". :-) Certainly not > sticking it inside the framework code. Alright, the bit where we stick the stuff that comes from different CVS's like the raw FAQs. /D