X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C5A11F65A8; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:41:09 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 0.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.541 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.541] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-ZB6yR86mmK; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:41:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11D411F65AE; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:41:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1FX1Uz-000Gi2-Bj; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:41:01 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Gborg still down Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:41:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Gborg still down thread-index: AcZldn4h7ilvnUhFQyGH2Xbv0h4PPQABNbMg From: "Dave Page" To: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Magnus Hagander" Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Jim C. Nasby" , , X-Archive-Number: 200604/147 X-Sequence-Number: 9923 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com]=20 > Sent: 21 April 2006 20:05 > To: Magnus Hagander > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Jim C. Nasby; Dave Page;=20 > greg@turnstep.com; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Gborg still down >=20 >=20 > > Because it makes more sense monitoring internet services from=20 > > *outside* the hosting network? ;-) >=20 > Well of course :) That's what we do. We have a server that=20 > sits somewhere else entirely that does our nagios. >=20 > My main point was it seems that this is something hub should=20 > be invovled in sense a lot of the core servers are hosted by hub. Most of the servers are not hosted by hub these days - we have them pretty well distributed around the world these days. Regards, Dave