Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:54:50 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C8BF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <44F44FD1.1070700@commandprompt.com>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] A counter productive conversation about search.
thread-index: AcbLd9te3KhAEaSDSrKuww+8uqiDYwAAyPng
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: "John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>,
	"PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com]=20
> Sent: 29 August 2006 15:32
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: John Hansen; PostgreSQL WWW
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] A counter productive conversation=20
> about search.
>=20
>=20
> > ServerWeight 100
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/
> > ServerWeight 50
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/
> >=20
> > I did get shot down as well though - iirc it was Oleg who was
> > essentially saying that the search engine should not have=20
> any knowledge
> > of the site beyond what it crawled.
>=20
> That won't work in aspseek. I looked into that too. It applies the=20
> weight to the whole site.

Yeah, I was confusing my self with options in Mnogosearch (which is very
similar in many ways).

Regards, Dave.