X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A699FB39E for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:51:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45128-07 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:51:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F129FB374 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:51:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GIjCU-0004kt-1u for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:51:09 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Wiki.postgresql.org Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:51:05 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Wiki.postgresql.org thread-index: AcbM4vnDo3U8ULvURTWjeGgrdKryGg== From: "Dave Page" To: Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/185 X-Sequence-Number: 10576 Marc, Please either remove entirely or prevent people from registering without approval on wiki.postgresql.org. It's already being used for precisely what we didn't want it to be used for - ie. A documentation and user oriented site (for which we have the main site and new techdocs), and not once has it yet been used as the developer collaboration resource it was intended as. Having a user wiki will just cause confusion and harks back to the days where we had a bunch of different, vaguely related sites. In this case the confusion is with techdocs, which although user contributed is moderated for appropriateness and accuracy of content. A user wiki may easily contain documents that are just plain wrong yet as an 'official' postgresql.org site, users are likely to take them as official guidance. The number of sincerely intended, but plain wrong doc comments we've moderated in the past is evidence of this. Regards, Dave.