X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79039FB37F;
	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:34:32 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 53224-05; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.86])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F050B9FB37C;
	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:34:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34]
	helo=vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1GQfYL-0006dp-Ln; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:34:29 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: Re: Who admins DNS?
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:34:29 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40176CF85@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356ED@algol.sollentuna.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Who admins DNS?
Thread-Index: Acbd6Ymh2FPLryjoTcOUd90jGVpvzwALohJgAABZqRA=
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	"Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200609/191
X-Sequence-Number: 10769

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 22 September 2006 08:25
> To: Marc G. Fournier; Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Who admins DNS?
>=20
> > > In the meantime, I'm prepared to act as another slave server.
> > The
> > > location I'm thinking of putting it has 30Mb connectivity, 12
> > hour
> > > battery and on-site generators; but I could put it somewhere with
> > more
> > > bandwidth if people think that'd be necessary.
> >=20
> > Right now, we are up to two in the UK, 3 in the US, 1 in Toronto
> > and 3 in Panama ... not sure where "yet another" would be ideally
> > located ...
>=20
> Well, one interesting thing is: are the two UK on the same connection?

Nope. Not even the same ISP.

/D