Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFDD9FB2C9 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 04:28:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31496-10 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7169FB252 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 04:28:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GWpYo-000GXk-CE for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:28:26 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: About docbot Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:28:26 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061009014354.8c198897.adsmail@wars-nicht.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] About docbot Thread-Index: AcbrRO9FuqWFP2I0QwKuYkKl2l6VdwAL12ag From: "Dave Page" To: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" , "Magnus Hagander" Cc: , , , , X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200610/13 X-Sequence-Number: 10802 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andreas=20 > 'ads' Scherbaum > Sent: 09 October 2006 00:44 > To: Magnus Hagander > Cc: david@fetter.org; gmr@ehpg.net; jd@commandprompt.com;=20 > ads@pgug.de; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] About docbot >=20 > > I'd really like to hear the input from some of the others on the web > > team as well :-) I think it sounds like a good idea in=20 > principle, but > > there are others... ,) >=20 > ok, what about this topic? > The consens sounded to me like using slony to replicate the bot db > to the website and display a prominent result set on top of the search > site. >=20 > Any intentions to move forward? Yes, I think so - but it's not going to happen overnight as the search engine needs to be rewritten first. This is progressing very well, but isn't there just yet. Regards, Dave.