Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFDC9FB221 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:31:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85546-02 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:31:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.86]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A76F9FB1F2 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:31:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GXC5T-000434-Lk for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:31:39 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: About docbot Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:31:39 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200610092217.11804.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] About docbot Thread-Index: AcbsEmCp0rHAIzcNQMirP73y99qI/AAK1ZDw From: "Dave Page" To: "Robert Treat" , Cc: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" , "Magnus Hagander" , , , , X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200610/18 X-Sequence-Number: 10807 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]=20 > Sent: 10 October 2006 03:17 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Cc: Dave Page; Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum; Magnus Hagander;=20 > david@fetter.org; gmr@ehpg.net; jd@commandprompt.com; ads@pgug.de > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] About docbot >=20 >=20 > Dave, whats your opinion on moving the database completly onto the=20 > postgresql.org server and doing away with the slony=20 > replication bit (which=20 > seems like overkill imho) We could then grant access to bots=20 > that need it or=20 > provide a full fledged web api to people who want to=20 > interface with it. The=20 > one thing I am wondering is that this would in theory be a=20 > higher load than=20 > the current website gives, since all requests would run=20 > through the db.=20 That does sound like a better idea to me... though it should go on the search server, not borg because it'll generally be used with the search engine. I assume the load is likely to be far less than the GIN/Tsearch engine that Magnus is currently developing? Regards Dave