X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6605E4A05 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:46:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99763-09 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:46:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8205E4A08 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:44:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C3Y1V-000PMp-0U for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:43:57 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving Archives Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:42:55 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Suggestion for improving Archives Thread-Index: AcSSNUR5+OhawQmiQLeP5848hVXY5AANquSV From: "Dave Page" To: "Josh Berkus" , "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/26 X-Sequence-Number: 5096 -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Josh Berkus Sent: Fri 9/3/2004 5:19 PM To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List Subject: [pgsql-www] Suggestion for improving Archives=20 > Both of those resources are faster and better search engines than the Mho= narc=20 > search could ever be, and neither eats CPU time on hub.org. Yes? Um, Mhonarc is the mail to html program which will still be required, and n= one of the searches run on hub.org currently anyway. Regards, Dave