X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D87D1B37D for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:00:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79905-05 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:00:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCA7D1B373 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:00:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BkOlh-0007QJ-0Y for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:00:29 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: Remove email search Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:00:28 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Remove email search Thread-Index: AcRo5efmXdLJSZ33R2yGc/iNj3k/egAAICYw From: "Dave Page" To: "Bruce Momjian" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" Cc: "PostgreSQL www" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/53 X-Sequence-Number: 4723 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: 13 July 2004 15:24 > To: Devrim GUNDUZ > Cc: PostgreSQL www > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Remove email search >=20 > I just tried it now and it was fast too. Strange. Maybe it=20 > is something on my end, or I just hit it at a bad time. >=20 > Sorry. No problem :-) > I still prefer the Google page layout because I can see an=20 > entire thread on one screen. Well, they have the whole groups.google/dejanews code doing all of that. Unfortunately we have somewhat more limited resources as you know. Also, bear in mind that our search engine covers a whole bunch of extra sites including the Gborg list archives which you won't find on google groups. > I also do think that at some point we have to stop relying on=20 > hub.org to pay our server/bandwidth bills and we have to pay=20 > our own way with donations by companies. I'm inclined to agree. Whilst I can't fault Marc's generosity on that front, it would be nice to be less dependant (and less of a liability to his business :-) ). On the other hand, as Marc just pointed out, perhaps the cash is best spent on advocacy and promotion. Regards, Dave