X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60FC14B2868 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:57:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85060-05 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:57:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3980F14B286C for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:57:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bunys-0007zA-0Z for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:57:06 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:57:05 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? Thread-Index: AcR/L5BrxMmHFZQSQL6QZHY9VmjHawASK6kQ From: "Dave Page" To: , "PostgreSQL www" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/60 X-Sequence-Number: 4835 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus > Sent: 10 August 2004 19:59 > To: PostgreSQL www > Subject: [pgsql-www] PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? >=20 > Folks, >=20 > In expectation of a flood of new users, I'm thinking that we need a=20 > PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list. I'd like to shift some of them many=20 > platform-specific questions we will certainly get to a=20 > different list from NOVICE and GENERAL. Are you really expecting that many platform specific questions? With a separate list I can already see the confusion as users get bounced onto another list because their question is slightly more of a platform issue, or actually an SQL issue. Just my 0.02p Regards, Dave