Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Request for download stats on release
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:00:10 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A76FB@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Request for download stats on release
Thread-Index: AcSApp2TQ8JZT7lxQOG4QQNT4Wh1SQAACHNQ
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL www" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]=20
> Sent: 12 August 2004 20:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL www
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Request for download stats on release
>=20
> Dave,
>=20
> > ?? I sent you numbers for 7.4....
>=20
> Yes, but per previous discussion:
> 1) The numbers for 7.4 omitted the largest traffic mirrors;
> 2) For several of the smaller mirrors, those numbers were for=20
> the week *after* the week of release, also limiting the data.

Yeah, but I think what Peter was suggesting was that if you got the same
figure from the same mirrors for 8.0, then at least you could say 'well,
it looks like a 175% increase over last time from these 10 mirrors,
let's assume the rest are the same'

/D