X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9045E5E4864; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:19:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90675-10; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 07:19:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8DC5E4844; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:19:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C4Dn1-0002hI-0U; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 07:19:47 +0000 Subject: Re: Comment forms in interactive docs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:19:47 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Comment forms in interactive docs Thread-Index: AcSS8NNvRtWGmCfKQeWXYgvyJqqdwAA8NNgg From: "Dave Page" To: "Robert Treat" Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Tom Lane" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" , "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/52 X-Sequence-Number: 5122 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]=20 > Sent: 05 September 2004 03:33 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Tom Lane; Devrim GUNDUZ; PostgreSQL WWW=20 > Mailing List > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Comment forms in interactive docs >=20 >=20 > I believe one significant difference is the php doc=20 > submissions are moderated, and therefore subject to less=20 > cruft. I've suggested in the past that doc submissions get=20 > posted to -www or -doc, but neither group seemed interested=20 > in supporting that. It's not so much that I'm not interested in it, more that I have enough to do already. If someone wants to volunteer to be moderator, I for one am happy for the code to be appropriately modified. /D