X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060D2329D28 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:51:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31235-01 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA71329C63 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:51:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CBKRp-0000Si-Hn for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:51:17 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups? Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:51:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups? Thread-Index: AcSirEW+I8kbw0XDTRW02w704s76MwAnPw1A From: "Dave Page" To: "Bruce Momjian" , "Dan Wolfe" Cc: "PostgreSQL www" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/173 X-Sequence-Number: 5243 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: 25 September 2004 04:03 > To: Dan Wolfe > Cc: PostgreSQL www > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with=20 > certain groups? >=20 >=20 > WWW guys: >=20 > I just received this from someone about Google archiving=20 > being terminated. Seems amazing but I checked Google and it=20 > seems true. Well, I don't know what else we can do, but I have sent them a message asking them to reconsider their decision. I guess the more people that do the same, the more chance we have of getting it switched back on. Perhaps Marc can fire a message at all appropriate groups? I hope this isn't the start of them winding down the not-so-profittable bits of Google... Regards, Dave.