X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7B32A0D0; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:32:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63443-10; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:32:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8259432A0C7; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:32:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCvQa-0003XZ-FD; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:32:36 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Server unreliability X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:32:35 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Server unreliability Thread-Index: AcSmcCfFWYedzhRYRJyMuI5ip3uCUAAT204g From: "Dave Page" To: "Devrim GUNDUZ" , "Bruce Momjian" Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" , "PostgreSQL advocacy" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/252 X-Sequence-Number: 5322 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Devrim GUNDUZ > Sent: 29 September 2004 23:03 > To: Bruce Momjian > Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List; PostgreSQL advocacy > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Server unreliability >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: >=20 > >> :-) A Google search box could be better sometimes... > > > > Yes, except Google has decided to stop archiving our groups since=20 > > September 16. We reported this on the www list, I think. I think=20 > > they had the best archive interface, and now it is gone.=20=20 > Take a look: > > > >=20=09 > >=20 > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DUTF-8&c2coff=3D1&group= =3Dcomp > > .databases.postgresql.hackers >=20 > Dave has contacted with Google, and I'm sure that they'll=20 > solve this problem. See: It's not looking good. I think we're going to need a mass of complaints form the users. Regards, Dave