X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD4132A0AA for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:11:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10292-07 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:11:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C414D32A0C4 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:11:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CD6LF-0006EJ-CC for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:11:49 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:11:01 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy Thread-Index: AcSnFp3Dqt87wD2MRhKLYTn75t5uEgACmS0Q From: "Dave Page" To: , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/318 X-Sequence-Number: 5388 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus > Sent: 30 September 2004 18:56 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [#14748606]=20 > comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy >=20 > People: >=20 > E-mail sent to Google. If we don't see any action in a=20 > couple of days, then=20 > I'll ask all of our community to e-mail them with requests to=20 > fix it. That=20 > will certainly get their attention. Hi Josh, In my first response from them, they did suggest that high demand was one way to get the groups reinstated. And in their defence, they did answer both times within 2 working days - the second time I even got a different form letter! Regards, Dave.