X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA3332A0AE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:18:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15112-02 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358AB32A0AA for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:18:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([80.176.1.146] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CD6SY-0007Jf-Bs for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:19:22 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: New site X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:18:34 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] New site Thread-Index: AcSnGXKJCtnUYTBLQqm7HJ6qAyBRwwACIJQA From: "Dave Page" To: "Chris Ryan" , "Robert Treat" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/320 X-Sequence-Number: 5390 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Ryan [mailto:xgbe@yahoo.com]=20 > Sent: 30 September 2004 19:15 > To: Robert Treat; Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site >=20 > I was a little currious about the gborg -> gforge=20 > conversion as well. I am just as guilty as the rest though=20 > for not keeping up on it. > Last I checked the GForge project looked like it was working. We host the win32 installer project on it and it works quite well. My only complaint is having to use SSL for CVS updates. SSL and CVS don't exactly play nicely together - it would make more sense if Subversion was being used as it had built in SSL support from what I've read. Regards, Dave