X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F23A3FCC;
	Tue,  2 Nov 2004 20:38:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 84440-07; Tue,  2 Nov 2004 20:38:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.91])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3673A3F97;
	Tue,  2 Nov 2004 20:38:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34]
	helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1CP5QC-000Gdp-CT; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 20:38:29 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: No link
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:38:07 -0000
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306F76@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] No link
Thread-Index: AcTBEqkoLFlxNxD7QCmoGMZMdwdUyAACPNCg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/24
X-Sequence-Number: 5755

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> Sent: 02 November 2004 19:32
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Mart=EDn Marqu=E9s; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] No link
>=20
> <http://www.inf.tu-dresden.de/~nk671652/_lit/slides/20041030-171608-08
> > 3.html> (taken at a different event that I went to after LWE).  The=20
> > current issue of Linux Magazin (Germany) also contains details. =20
> > "PostgreSQL 8"
> > beat "MySQL 5.0" by 48% to 30% or so.
>=20
> Neat, and we haven't even released it yet :)

Yeah, but on the other hand, given MySQL's record, v5 probably won't be =
out for a year or three yet either. Still, that gives us plenty of time =
to widen the feature gap even further...

/D