X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CEA3A433F; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:24:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59620-01; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABA63A4346; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CPGR8-00059i-Cc; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:24:10 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: No link X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:23:50 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] No link Thread-Index: AcTBYH7ofMZVUEtkRhySpU56wcvLKwAHaOmQ From: "Dave Page" To: "Justin Clift" Cc: "Devrim GUNDUZ" , "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/32 X-Sequence-Number: 5763 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Clift [mailto:justin@postgresql.org]=20 > Sent: 03 November 2004 04:49 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] No link >=20 > Dave Page wrote: > > >=20 > > If you like. Many ppl submit them in HTML format anyway. >=20 > Actually, no they don't. >=20 > I just generally go through and turn non-links into links=20 > every couple of days for the more interesting news items to=20 > they're easier to people to use. Oh, so you update them but leave them for me or Devrim to approve? :-) 'Cos I've certainly approved a number in the past with pre-HTMLified links. Still, it won't hurt for it to be automated anyway, as long as it doesn't mess up ones that are already done. Regards, Dave