X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8E83A437B; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64046-02; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:44:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF753A420D; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:44:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CPGlK-000OfK-47; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:45:02 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:44:32 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org Thread-Index: AcTBRCWfs1us8azmRvWC2t0DaZGxhQAPGpXw From: "Dave Page" To: "Oleg Bartunov" , "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Alexey Borzov" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/33 X-Sequence-Number: 5764 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:oleg@sai.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 03 November 2004 01:26 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Alexey Borzov; Dave Page; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org >=20 > Its interesting to see how webperf.org sees different=20 > postgresql.org pages. For example, Yes, that is interesting. What's even more interesting is running the stats on www.postgresql.org/index.php. All of a sudden, it becomes apparent that the servers isn't doing a bad job serving static HTML, it's the PHP stuff that's dog slow. > But, I again want to stress that current architecture of=20 > postgresql.org sites are very-very bad and you will never get=20 > nice performance and scalability especially for dynamic sites without: Agreed, but I think there's a more fundamental problem to fix before getting down to the level of optimisation you suggest. Regards, Dave.