X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160383A44A3 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:53:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05129-04 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629CE3A4478 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:53:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CPfF4-0004Hb-MJ for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:53:24 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: Testing new website code Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:53:22 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Testing new website code Thread-Index: AcTCWMbdzCKwIL4sTsK5slQi7gSmIQAAHj6Q From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/93 X-Sequence-Number: 5824 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Borzov > Sent: 04 November 2004 10:24 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgsql-www] Testing new website code >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Those who do not believe that there is something wrong with=20 > the box running wwwdevel, can now check for themselves. You're missing the point - it's not that we don't believe something is wrong, it's the box is not loaded enough to see the performance we've been getting. What we're trying to do is figure what is actually wrong whether at the OS, PHP, DB, Pear or portal code level. As you will have seen from other posts, a couple of changes have already made significant differences - your testing on another box indicates that there is probably not a problem at the Pear or portal levels, thus we should probably be looking at the OS/PHP/DB some more. Regardsm, Dave.