X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AA33A1EC1; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:28:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47859-10; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DAF3A3BC3; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:28:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CRnpg-0006X9-1w; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:28:00 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FTP mirror problems X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:27:59 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [GENERAL] FTP mirror problems Thread-Index: AcTGoRRuH06TjvI8TzKOoQ/jfLhATgAXgExA From: "Dave Page" To: "Robert Treat" , "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" , , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/134 X-Sequence-Number: 5865 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat > Sent: 09 November 2004 21:14 > To: Marc G. Fournier > Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane; pgsql-www@postgresql.org;=20 > pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [GENERAL] FTP mirror problems >=20 >=20 > IMHO they should be left as is. I've certainly had to make=20 > use of older versions of the software in the past, and would=20 > not presume to know when others won't want them in the=20 > future. We keep a link to "latest" in the main directory,=20 > and I'm willing to believe most people are capable of=20 > figuring out which is the latest 7.3.x branch on their own=20 > (at least until I see evidence to the contrary). =20 I was going to write something similar, but seeing as you got there first, 'I agree!' Regard,s dave