X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFF63A4A26 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:18:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57961-10 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:18:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F043A49AF for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:18:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CSwrK-000BLt-Ac for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:18:26 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PASCAL-advocacy] [PASCAL-www] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:18:25 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PASCAL-advocacy] [PASCAL-www] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design Thread-Index: AcTJRB8Ui6umxmdHRGGmxezfH5eeowANIDMQ From: "Dave Page" To: "Robert Treat" , "Gavin M. Roy" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/203 X-Sequence-Number: 5934 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]=20 > Sent: 13 November 2004 05:44 > To: Gavin M. Roy > Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; Alexey Borzov; Josh Berkus;=20 > pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Omar Kilani; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PASCAL-advocacy] [PASCAL-www] Alternate=20 > PostgreSQL.org Design >=20 > Gavin, you are on the -www list aren't you? It's been posted=20 > there many times.=20 > Just in case not, it's at http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/todo It was posted with some other URLs you might find useful earlier in this very thread :-) Web CVS: http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgweb/cvs/cvs.php/portal Commiter list: http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/pgweb-commits/ > > Alexey posted a tarball of his source, but after my last=20 > contribution=20 > > via email to the current Lucaz design went completely=20 > unnoticed and=20 > > didnt even receive a no-thanks, we'd rather keep it the way=20 > it is, I'm=20 > > a bit out of the loop on what it takes to actually get=20 > something done. >=20 > Huh? IIRC the last patch I saw you send in was applied by=20 > Dave a couple days later? Wrong Gavin! I don't recall seeing anything from you, Gavin (M Roy). Can you resend it please - maybe my spam filters were bored that day. > > >I realise I'm probably one of the people you accuse of=20 > being rude and=20 > > >shooting down ideas (and if I have been rude to anyone,=20 > please excuse=20 > > >me > > > > To be honest, I can only come up with a few people off hand and you=20 > > werent one of them Dave ;). That's not to say.. well never mind. I'm not entirely sure how to take that! > This is generally true only if it is a rehash of something we=20 > have been over dozens of times. Kind of like when people=20 > pop-up on -hackers and say "I'm ready to start coding up a=20 > threaded back-end, which files should I be looking=20 > at" =20 Wow, that's exactly the analagy I was going to use` > Otherwise my experience has been more of people asking=20 > what they can=20 > do to help and us responding with "look at the todo/look at=20 > the portal code"=20 > and then people either disappear or people point out they=20 > were hoping to implement some CMS or other radical whizbang=20 > code and then they disappear after we we don't get=20 > enthusiastic about it.=20 That's almost precisely my view of the situation. > You have to realize that this is at least the 5th design we=20 > have seen for the new site, none of which get us any closer=20 > to getting the new site launched if for no other reason that=20 > each of these designs seems to spur another round of website=20 > flaming. Also, for the record, I ask the tinysofa people if=20 > they would be interested in submitting some updated banners=20 > and/or buttons for our propaganda page and got no response. =20 > That's another example of us trying to find ways for people=20 > to get involved and people not bothering when it's not on=20 > their personal agenda.=20 Would they still want to do it if there was no link to their website at the bottom of each page? Incidently, Lukasz' design didn't originally have such a link. We suggested he put one there by way of thanks. Just a thought... Regards, Dave.