Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:28:44 -0000
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4307258@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
Thread-Index: AcTP/khf71/cblJwThuNHO5e9vEOmAAEkV8g
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>, <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]=20
> Sent: 21 November 2004 19:14
> To: Joshua D. Drake
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Dave Page; Josh Berkus; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
>=20
>=20
> Actually, looking at the Microsoft website Dave pointed to,=20
> it looks fixed-width to me ... and left justified instead of=20
> centered ... I wish doing a 'view source' was a bit easier to=20
> read, but from the way their javascript is defined at the=20
> top, it looks to be fixed to 855?

Yeah, they seem have have changed it recently. Try the 'Windows Server
System' link, or http://msdn.microsoft.com to see examples of the older
style.

I agree with Joshua incidently (which is why I mentioned the site in the
first place). Many ppl hate Microsoft, but they are undeniably good at
user interface design.

/D