X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C74A3A3D05 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:49:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80451-02 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:48:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965593A3D3E for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:48:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CWXI7-000DmX-Ft for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:48:56 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Counting clicks, Download page? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:48:55 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Counting clicks, Download page? Thread-Index: AcTQgsmsuZVUUQYMS4eTsA1AV2yD6wAvo8Dg From: "Dave Page" To: "Alexey Borzov" Cc: , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/334 X-Sequence-Number: 6065 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off@cs.msu.su]=20 > Sent: 22 November 2004 11:00 > To: Dave Page > Cc: josh@agliodbs.com; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Counting clicks, Download page? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Dave Page wrote: > > Nope, not as it stands. Virtually everything is static HTML=20 > now for speed and mirror-ability. If you want to log ftp=20 > mirror selections, then it'll need to go back to being a php=20 > script on one server, giving us a single point of failure on=20 > perhaps the second most important part of the site (next to=20 > the front page). >=20 > In fact the mirror selection page now *should* be a dynamic=20 > page on one server only (and that's the main reason I am so=20 > concerned about that server's performance). Don't worry about that - it's in hand. > In any other case=20 > you'll *not* be able to use ip2country. As I vaguely seem to recall stating at the time it was implemented. It's only a minor convenience thing (seeing as most ppl know their own country), and puts both load on the server, and creates a single point of failure. > But current implementation of mirror selection will not give=20 > any useful > stats: it will only show how many people went to an FTP=20 > mirror, not whether they actually downloaded something. Agreed. Regards, Dave.