X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0AA3A3EF2; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:01:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78257-08; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:01:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BDE3A1D8D; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:01:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CX4Gl-00034K-2o; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:01:43 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: PostgreSQL mirror test report X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:01:43 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL mirror test report Thread-Index: AcTR6sRQB6Kx7ta1SPGfwatZoIwLGQAfbUAw From: "Dave Page" To: "Tom Lane" , Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/347 X-Sequence-Number: 6078 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: 24 November 2004 05:59 > To: webmaster@postgresql.org > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL mirror test report=20 >=20 > webmaster@postgresql.org writes: > > PostgreSQL.org mirror check script starting... > > [much snipped] >=20 > Um, do we really need this sent to the whole list each day? Well it is the www list, and this is the sort of thing this list was setup for. I admit the email isn't too informative yet, but the intention is to start adding the error counts and actions taken to the report, thus allowing us to take appropriate additional action where required.=20 Regards, Dave